When building accidents occur, the evaluation and deliberation procedures to verify safety continuously increase, imposing temporal and economic burdens on building owners and designers. Additionally, in responding to repetitive evaluations and deliberations, the concentration on core design tasks may diminish, potentially leading to a decline in design quality and, consequently, a reduction in the system's effectiveness. This study recognizes these issues and aims to secure institutional efficiency by examining the issues and improvement tasks in the operation procedures of the structural safety assessment system during the building design process.